User talk:50.200.90.234

June 2017
Hello, I'm Home Lander. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Hardy Boyz— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 21:37, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm 99.53.112.186. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lockdown (2013) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 99.53.112.186 (talk) 17:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Genesis (2013), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 99.53.112.186 (talk) 17:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Lockdown (2013), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. 99.53.112.186 (talk) 17:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Lockdown (2013). 99.53.112.186 (talk) 17:49, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at SummerSlam (2007), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Nickag 989 talk 17:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Suggest using Show Preview
Hi IP, while your edits on List of the largest fast food restaurant chains have been good, can I suggest you use Show preview to check your changes or your own sandbox instead of accepting your change and seeing if it worked. As it shows on the page you have now made 12 edits |Edits when you could have done it in two or three. NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm NZ Footballs Conscience. An edit that you recently made to List of the largest fast food restaurant chains seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sorry, I had to revert your edits as it was starting to get messy. NZ Footballs Conscience  (talk) 23:33, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome!

 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on WHBQ-TV. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Removal of 'virtual and VHF digital'
Per this it appears you are removing the phrase 'virtual and UHF digital' from more then one article on TV stations. It does not appear that you ever supply an edit summary or a reference for these changes. Can you explain what this is about? As you've been informed above, a complaint about you has been made at WP:AN3. If these removals have some rational basis, it would be helpful to know what it is. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Agree with EdJohnston. Here is another example. It is a well-established convention in TV station articles that we give the virtual and RF channel numbers in the lede sentence. Please do not remove such information. Jeh (talk) 20:44, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to WPXI, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jeh (talk) 01:43, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at KCPQ. Tornado chaser (talk) 02:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit warring at WHBQ-TV and other TV station articles
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. A complaint about you was filed at Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive358. You have never replied to any complaints you have received about your editing of TV station articles. You've been taking out the term 'virtual channel' from the leads of TV station articles for some time. Other places you've done it are: WTVD, KGO-TV, WKRC-TV, WTTV and WPLG. You should be aware these removals are controversial because they are usually undone by others. These removals need consensus, and if you never discuss, that will be hard for you to achieve. EdJohnston (talk) 03:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to WJW (TV), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  WC  Quidditch  &#9742;   &#9998;  20:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Hello 50.200.90.234. If you don't reply to this concern, you may be blocked for a longer time. This edit shows you once again removing 'virtual channel' from a TV station article, which was mentioned to you above. EdJohnston (talk) 21:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for continued removal of material. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Amortias (T)(C) 22:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Allie (wrestler). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. StaticVapor message me!   04:48, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to KISW
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, KISW, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 19:39, 27 November 2019 (UTC)