User talk:50.201.27.93

May 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Stock market index has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stock market index was changed by 50.201.27.93 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967802 on 2015-05-05T17:38:49+00:00.

May 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Teresa Amabile has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:30, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Teresa Amabile was changed by 50.201.27.93 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878803 on 2016-05-02T16:30:04+00:00.

September 2016
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lens flare have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:21, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Encryption— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017
Hello, I'm Iambic Pentameter. I noticed that in this edit to United States v. Nixon, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Iambic Pentameter (talk / contribs) 15:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello, I'm Blue Edits. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Josh Stein, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Blue Edits (talk) 15:10, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rich has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:33, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rich was changed by 50.201.27.93 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.978743 on 2017-12-12T14:33:16+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hater. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:40, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hater was changed by 50.201.27.93 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.990805 on 2017-12-12T14:40:41+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rich, you may be blocked from editing. – Gilliam (talk) 14:42, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Epidermolysis bullosa simplex— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lactose. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 15:46, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Marcus (name), you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 15:47, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm SleepForever. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Pope Benedict IX have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. SleepForever (talk) 12:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pope Benedict IX. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SleepForever (talk) 14:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shirley Temple. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  13:39, 9 June 2021 (UTC)