User talk:50.205.182.253

September 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Robots (2005 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Regarding your changes adding redlinks
Before removing your redlinks again and moving discussion to the article talk pages, I thought it would be worth talking about this. Redlinks are intended for topics which are noteworthy and are likely to have a wikipedia article written about them. (See WP:REDLINKS.) Their purpose is to encourage people to write articles on the topics. Your changes don't appear to take any of this into account. They're just creating a wall of red text. How do you see this as making Wikipedia a better encyclopedia? Dan Bloch (talk) 03:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Stop making these changes or your account will be blocked
I looked into these articles' history, and you are currently blocked from editing Wikipedia until March under a different IP address. I don't know the process to extend that block to your new IP address, but if you continue to make changes and not engage with other editors, I'm sure I can figure it out. Dan Bloch (talk) 22:15, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Robots (2005 film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1989 in literature. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan Bloch (talk) 00:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 1983 in literature, you may be blocked from editing. Dan Bloch (talk) 23:52, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 1991 in literature. Dan Bloch (talk) 02:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

That's Wikipedia's policy, this isn't just me. Please discuss the changes you want to make. If you just keep reverting you'll be blocked. Dan Bloch (talk) 04:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Robots (2005 film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Please stop adding poorly sourced content and all the red links. The latter is helpful when it is limited to a certain amount as it encourages editors to create an article on noteworthy subjects. The wall of red links are not only displeasing to the eyes but also unhelpful. Please discuss your changes beforehand as you’ve now been reverted by three different editors on List of Robin Williams performances. FrB.TG (talk) 23:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2023
Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Robots (2005 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Yoshi24517 Chat   Online  21:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Disney villain characters. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CycloneYoris talk! 22:35, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jake Miller (singer), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:06, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mrs. Doubtfire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 11:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of fictional ungulates. --Mr Fink (talk) 22:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Joe Alaskey, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 17:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Binette Schroeder, you may be blocked from editing. Wracking talk! 02:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

September 2023
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Ark Encounter, you may be blocked from editing. Wracking talk! 13:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jodi Benson. Waxworker (talk) 07:10, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Binette Schroeder, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see MOS:OVERLINK Waxworker (talk) 00:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Binette Schroeder. Wracking talk! 22:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2024
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Robots (2005 film). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. see MOS:OVERLINK Waxworker (talk) 23:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Iring Fetscher, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. please see MOS:OVERLINK, you have previously been warned about this Waxworker (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lynn Redgrave. Waxworker (talk) 02:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 06:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)