User talk:50.206.149.166

Blocked again for 1 year
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ONE YEAR??!! ONE REAL YEAR??!! First, are you aware that this is a school IP address, and that no one has appeared to make any disruptive edits since the previous block expired. 50.206.149.166 (talk) 15:14, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Please also provide some revision diffs to show which edits since the previous block expired have been disruptive. 50.206.149.166 (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:DUCK Block evasion and WP:NOTHERE; but you already knew that. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * How am I not here to build an encyclopedia? 50.206.149.166 (talk) 15:35, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

C'mon, really?

 * I have made the following edits since the previous block expired: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. The only one I could see to even be mildly disruptive is number 5, but even so, it's not that bad. 50.206.149.166 (talk) 15:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * That really makes my case, does it not? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The only edit in question is number 5, and that's not even complete vandalism. How does that one make me not here to build an encyclopedia? All the others have been constructive. 50.206.149.166 (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Why did you remove my question from your talk page? It was a good-faith request for explanation. 50.206.149.166 (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Armadillo— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sutter's Mill— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 12:40, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sutter's Mill. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - The   Magnificentist  12:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Help:Authority control, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)