User talk:50.209.153.254

I am simply enforcing Wiki rules while Zefr is breaking them. Please do not attack me because he is a Senior Editor. He is breaking the rules, he is beyond his scope, he is acting as a vandal. Enforce these rules fairly.

May 2019
Zefr, please engage in consensus-building on the talk page; WP:BRD.'' Zefr (talk) 23:26, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Cannabigerol shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''There is an open discussion on the talk page; that is where you can try to gain consensus through discussion; WP:CON. '' Zefr (talk) 04:33, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

WP:NPA
On my talk page, you said: "Zefr, you are a vandal and narcissist. I have repeatedly asked you to stop vandalizing my posts, that are well-cited, that are in my area of expertise. You are a disturbed person well beyond your element and your behavior is disturbing. You have a mental disorder. Please stop vandalizing these posts on topics that you have no idea about. This is your final warning. Please simply accept reality." and also "Zefr is a narcissist with a mental disorder who continues to edit posts outside his area of knowledge." Wikipedia is about building content in collaboration. When someone objects to your edit for reasons given clearly on the Cannabigerol edit comments and talk page, the collaboration begins by editors discussing why or why not an edit and sources are useful. So far, you are not engaging in this process, and are warned. --Zefr (talk) 04:40, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 04:46, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Article talk page
Why have you failed to participate on the article talk page? That is the place where you work to build consensus for your changes. Please do so, once your block expires. El_C 04:50, 7 May 2019 (UTC)