User talk:50.221.225.231

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! —  Newslinger  talk   20:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics.

—  Newslinger  talk   20:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

What "disruptive editing" are you accusing me of? 50.221.225.231 (talk) 22:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Per WP:ADMINACCT, you're required to explain and justify your action. 50.221.225.231 (talk) 00:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Read the block summary.  Acroterion   (talk)  


 * Quote this alleged "explanation". 50.221.225.231 (talk) 02:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Given your familiarity with a variety of bluelinked policies and guidelines, this appears to be yet more tendentious behavior, and I'm confident that you don't need my help to find the block summary, to understand expectations for editor conduct in contentious topics, or to understand that your conduct at Talk:Anti-gender movement is disruptive, and that your attitude toward other editors is hostile and sanctionable. It is very clear that this isn't your first time in this situation. Disruptive editors are not arbiters of whether they're satisfied with explanations, the community is. If you think you should be unblocked and can address your conduct toward other editors, ask for an unblock. Your behavior will probably receive greater scrutiny if you do.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Requesting an explanation for your block is NOT in any way "tendentious behavior". It is explicitly authorized by WP:ADMINACCT:
 * It is deeply disturbing that you want to label my request for an explanation "tendentious behavior". It's downright Kafkaesque. Frankly, it reflects terribly on your suitability for adminship.
 * How so? You continue to evade the central question. It's very telling that you repeatedly refuse to explain what this alleged "disruptive behavior" is. Perhaps you'd like to review WP:ADMINABUSE, since you appear to be engaging in it right now.
 * 50.221.225.231 (talk) 19:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 50.221.225.231 (talk) 19:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)


 * You're not doing much to make me think I was mistaken in my assessment of your conduct, your level of proficiency with Wikipedia and probable past and present sanctions, and your treatment of other editors. If you think you're being treated badly, then make an unblock request. Otherwise, this just looks like filibustering.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:11, 1 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Yet again, you refuse to even state what these alleged "disruptive edits" are. Very telling. Your WP:ADMINABUSE and misconduct is blatant at this point.
 * Any "unblock request" should come after you explain what your block was even for. Which you've repeatedly refused to do. 50.221.225.231 (talk) 02:49, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Just make an unblock request. That will tap into a formalized process you can use. Your refusal to do so is itself problematic. Follow procedure. -- Valjean (talk) ( PING me ) 03:43, 1 October 2023 (UTC)


 * There is nothing "problematic" about this. You need to review procedure. Read WP:BLOCKFAQ:
 * 50.221.225.231 (talk) 04:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 50.221.225.231 (talk) 04:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)


 * What is that supposed to mean? Please be specific. You might want to keep WP:ASPERSIONS in mind, since this remark of yours might be included as evidence in a possible WP:ADMINABUSE case. 50.221.225.231 (talk) 04:40, 1 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Suit yourself. Before you do that, please read WP:SATISFY, especially the last line. It's a lot more relevant that the links you keep posting.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * You've still refused to state which specific edits you deem "disruptive", let alone why. Very telling. Rest assured the record will show that. Please read WP:ADMINACCT:
 * and WP:BLOCKFAQ:
 * 50.221.225.231 (talk) 01:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 50.221.225.231 (talk) 01:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 50.221.225.231 (talk) 01:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! ... sawyer  * he/they *  talk  03:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)