User talk:50.237.197.178

April 2023
Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you recently removed content from William Luther Pierce without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 12:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Doug,
 * I removed the sentence in which the SPLC refers to cosmotheism as a "bogus religion", because it is subjective and not pertinent to the definition or description of cosmotheism. It appears to be added to the end of the paragraph for no reason other than to include the SPLC's opinion of it. I have noticed this fact throughout the entire article actually.
 * Is that an adequate explanation? 50.237.197.178 (talk) 17:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * No, that's your own opinion/research etc. WP:NOR is clear about that.  Doug Weller  talk 07:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at William Luther Pierce shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 18:10, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop removing well-sourced content from William Luther Pierce simply because you don't like it. You risk being blocked for tendentious editing if you continue down that road. Bishonen &#124; tålk 19:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC).