User talk:50.246.245.129

December 2021
My edit to the Sathya Sai Baba page increases the accuracy and scientific validity of Wikipedia. If you disagree with my reasoning please provide valid logical arguments or produce the proper citations. Otherwise, the statement I removed should be removed, as it is unverified, the citations are invalid. A CNN article is not a "study." Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sathya Sai Baba, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 00:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sathya Sai Baba, you may be blocked from editing. If you feel there are issues with the sources, you need to discuss the matter on the talk page and wait for consensus. —C.Fred (talk) 00:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

I have explained my edits each and every time. Have you not seen them? Should I be posting my explanations somewhere else? The portion I removed DOES NOT link to valid citations. Please stop reverting my edits without adequate explanation.


 * No, you haven't made a single post to Talk:Sathya Sai Baba. The "multiple studies" phrasing was arrived at after a talk page discussion, ending in a consensus in favour of the current wording. --bonadea contributions talk 13:13, 7 January 2022 (UTC)