User talk:50.4.185.219

Liberals at Wikipedia are biased. For instance Trump's page, is basically a bash Trump piece whilst Biden's has nothing negative about him. When it comes to anything Christian the article is written to heavily favor evolution and atheism while referring to anything in the Christian faith as a "myth". Atheism is written as the only belief one can have. The January 6th protest and rigged election are bashed just as Trump's page is as "baseless" yet there's more evidence to the contrary. Anything political heavily favors the left. LGBT is also seen as the only correct view. BLM page is incorrect as it has already been proven the organization is a sham and an arm of the Democratic Party. It looks for racism where none exists and there isn't one thing the organization has done to help black lives as opposed to line it's pockets. Anyone with a different view from the liberal left leaning editors is immediately blocked. At best Wikipedia is "for entertainment purposes only" at worse its just another way to push a narrative. No one with any intelligence or academic credibility would cite Wikipedia as a reliable source of information.
 * Yes, no one should cite Wikipedia for academic or scholarly work. See Wikipedia is not a reliable source.  Readers should review the sources themselves in determining or judging the content of an article for themselves.  I also suggest that you see Joe Biden sexual assault allegation and Hunter Biden laptop controversy as examples of negative coverage of Joe Biden. No religious beliefs (or lack thereof) are favored here. If you think we are pushing a narrative, and would prefer to drink the kool aid and be told only what you want to hear, this isn't the place for you, and you probably shouldn't come here. 331dot (talk) 08:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If you further vandalize this page with attacks on other human beings, your access will be removed. I don't think those comments are very Christian, as Christ preached love and tolerance of others. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more of your recent additions to the page Antipas Mbusa because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cyber, you may be blocked from editing. 05:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cyber. Ʃx talk &#124; contribs 05:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Testicles as food have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Testicles as food was changed by 50.4.185.219 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952853 on 2022-09-10T05:22:43+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 08:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Parag Agrawal have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:13, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Parag Agrawal was changed by 50.4.185.219 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953105 on 2022-12-06T08:13:34+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Parag Agrawal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — hako9 (talk) 08:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Baby Got Back—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Profiles in Courage have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Profiles in Courage was changed by 50.4.185.219 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878454 on 2023-08-30T19:58:38+00:00