User talk:50.53.24.10

February 2019
Hello, I'm Bennv3771. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mike S. Miller, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 19:31, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mike S. Miller, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Agent00x (talk) 21:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Loved150. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mike S. Miller have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. ''Twitter is not a reliable source. Also don't add libelous information '' Loved150 (talk) 16:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm the user that keeps adding this controversy to Mike S. Miller's entry. It is of valid historical value to people that are not necessarily his fans. He is very proud of what he has done, according to his own social media usage, and the twitter accounts that I have cited belong to him and others involved in this story so are reliable sources for this story. It seems to me that the people who keep removing this information have no interest in history and only want to whitewash the actions of Mike S. Miller.


 * Whitewashing is not permitted here; nor is referring to a subject's behavior as 'impotent rage' . Tread gently if you plan to contribute here, please. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:16, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * For a series of edits like this . 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

I am fine with the article as is. The citations contain all that I want to say. Many find this story of great importance and feel that it must be represented properly in Mr. Miller's professional history. I apologize for the inflammatory language but there are many trying to make this story disappear or lessen its impact to the family and friends of the deceased individual involved. Lines such as "Trolled fans of the late Mike Wieringo into oblivion." had been added and not flagged or removed as mine had been.

I would like to add that a troll vandalized this page once again and it was left up for over an hour before I had to remove it. You are all very quick to remove my edits that you see as being in bad faith while you allowed statements about "trolling the SJW's" and non-partial praise of Mr. Miller's trolling abilities. This very much makes me lose faith in the moderators of this page and can be seen as a possible bias within that group. Some of us are trying to add an instance from this person's career where he impugned the reputation of another artist and made fraudulent claims that are all well published in the comics media.

I'm done. You wear your biases on your sleeves. I no longer trust Wikipedia as a reliable source if such shenanigans can be allowed on such a meaningless artist's page. Good job, moderators.