User talk:50.58.96.2

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (50.58.96.2) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and  [ create an account] . If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 21:08, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your edit to code division multiple access with the comment "Incomplete edit, maybe?"
I suspect the extra clause you removed from code division multiple access in this edit was just restating the previous clause, but with less detail, so removing it was the right thing to do. Some Wikipedia edits appear to take a more complicated statement and add a simpler (but not necessarily better!) restatement, making the article redundant. Guy Harris (talk) 23:21, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * (I.e., you did exactly what needed to be done. Thanks!) Guy Harris (talk) 23:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

When I make errors like that in my own writing, it usually happens when I both move something and rephrase it at the same time. Sometimes I forget to remove the original version after typing the new version in the new place, because the rephrase makes the repetition less visually obvious. So that was my guess, but if you do this a lot, yours is probably the more likely explanation. Anyway, glad I could help. I would be so lost reading these specs without Wikipedia to give an overview of each new concept. The simple example on that page finally clicked "orthogonal codes" into place for me.