User talk:50.64.106.236/sandbox

Assignment #1 (Microbial Fuel Cells)
Microbial fuel cells

The facts in the article are adequately cited from sixty sources that mostly consist of reliable peer-reviewed journal and academic press entries. Citation was however, missing on the History section that elaborates on microbial fuel cell function discovery. A few suspect source materials were also identified to be official websites ([41], [43]), self-published ([53]), blog posts ([44]) and promotional ([28], [51], [40]). Additionally, hyperlinks were not present for some references, but were legitimate scientific journal entries, or were directed to missing pages ([47], [3], [48]). No presence of plagiarism or paraphrasing was detected in the article.

The article material is mostly relevant to the article topic and has a clear and understandable lead that elaborates on microbial fuel cells aptly. All sections and images were relevant and well structured to Microbial fuel cell discussion, while more important sections such as Types, Application and Generation Process were appropriately discussed further. If anything, the viewpoint on biorecovery could have been represented and updated for more application elaboration. For example, biorecovery in microbial fuel cells have also been found to reduce pollution like acidic mine drainage by oxidizing acidic metals like Fe(II) to goethite (Cheng et al., 2010).

No claims or biases were identified, as each statement was expressed in a heavily cited and neutrally factual-based manner. The talk page contained a number of conversations and edits from 2006 to 2016, that indicate the article has been collectively discussed and edited on several occasions.

Jgggana (talk) 20:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)