User talk:50.72.22.99

December 2017
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Prince George of Cambridge, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:00, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

It's obvious the child has no royal blood - you don't get brown eyes from blue. Where is YOUR source that the child is royal, for instance? For instance, one source that King Leopold of the Belgians had 2 illegitimate children, but that is unproven. King Charles II allegedly had illegitimate children, but some that were claimed were biologically not his. Same in the case of King Leopold and others. NOT proven.

February 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that in this edit to Leopold I of Belgium, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 05:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You replaced incorrect information - it's alleged children - one source is not proof. A little heavy handed with the blocking, but then again, some people need to be internet warriors. Kind of high-handed and cowardly to randomly block people, but this is Wikipedia, the source of all things untrue or incorrect.

January 2019
Hello, I'm KNHaw. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Leopold I of Belgium seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KNHaw  (talk)  08:35, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Château du Stuyvenberg, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. KNHaw  (talk)  08:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Leopold I of Belgium, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. KNHaw  (talk)  06:41, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Leopold I of Belgium. KNHaw  (talk)  01:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.