User talk:50.81.109.120

I added the review from Quillete this morning--I wasn't signed on at the time but I can sign and re-enter the review on if you feel it is important to do so. I'm certainly open to suggestions for revision--or, for that matter, I'm willing to simply have you or someone else include the gist of the review in the way you prefer as long as the core criticisms aren't withheld.

Your article included only glowing reviews ("groundbreaking, "exceptional, "invaluable, "brilliant") and gives the false impression that the book is without fault and universally respected. In fact, Saini is a non-scientist and the book, which I just read, comes off as extremely one-sided and dogmatic.

Quillette cannot be sweepingly dismissed as "generally unreliable." It is perhaps the leading online magazine devoted to free thought today. And it has published articles from the likes of Steven Pinker, James (Flynn Effect") Flynn and a host of other leading intellectuals of our time. You felt no hesitation using a review from 'Slate' which is generally regarded as a left-leaning and certainly his its own biases.