User talk:50FN1

G-23 Congress moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, G-23 Congress, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... disco spinster   talk  22:30, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi 50FN1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Storchy (talk) 04:10, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into G-23 Congress. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

I did not copied from any page. I created one. I came to know later that the same page existed but it was empty. I did research and filled the information I spent so many man hours, please do not call it “cut and paste”. 50FN1 (talk) 10:59, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Palam Village


The article Palam Village has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NGEO, lacks any sources or references."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 05:39, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Your article Palam 360 Khap (Dilli)
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Palam 360 Khap (Dilli) to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 05:41, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Palam 360 Khap (Dilli) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Palam 360 Khap (Dilli), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Redirect of Ranjit Singh Chautala
Hi - you moved Ranjit Singh Chautala to Chaudhury Ranjeet Singh with no explanation of the change. In English, the common spelling of this politician is Ranjit Singh or Ranjit Singh Chautala, recent examples: Haryana Assembly, Indian Express, Indian Express, The Tribune. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 02:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi - The name Chautala is name of his village not his actual surname or last name. Chaudhary Ranjit Singh's brother and his brother's family uses this name "Chautala" not by Chaudhary Ranjit Singh himself. The News and media are often confused and they also use "Chautala" as his last name but it is a mistake. I have met Chaudhary Ranjit Singh many times and have asked this to him too. I'm attaching his official account usernames where you can see that he doesn't use "Chautala" instead he uses "Chaudhary" or "Ch" as short for Chaudhary. His contact details are mentioned on his Official blue tick facebook page, you can confirm this by contacting him. choudharyranjeetsingh61@gmail.com and 094160 48386.
 * P.S please upload his latest photo too as I am having some difficulty in it, Thank you
 * Twitter
 * Facebook
 * Instagram
 * Official government Page
 * (talk) 05:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi - it looks like you have a connection to this politician. It is important to be aware of conflict of interest, in particular please note "you are strongly discouraged from editing affected articles directly" and also the part on disclosure. On names, Wikipedia is guided by the WP:COMMONNAME policy, which basically means we use what is most commonly used in reliable sources, hence in this case why the appropriate title of the article is Ranjit Singh Chautala. If you can point me to an unrestricted photograph (ie no copyright limitations) I'm happy to upload it. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 21:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, As I have said that "I have met Chaudhary Ranjit Singh many time", it doesn't mean that I have some sort of connection with him. He is a politician and he meets hundreds of people like me everyday. I met him in some social events where politicians are chief guests, he doesn't even know my name. I think you are not understanding any of the things I have said. I gave you so many examples about his name and yet you are still arguing and assuming things and telling me that I can't edit this page further, this is not fair at all. I would like to tell you that I have a keen interest in politics and you can check my edits I mostly edit pages related to politics. It will be very helpful of you, if you would change his name so that readers will know the exact information. Please go to those links of Chaudhary Ranjit Singh's official social media handle Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and Governement website, he uses "Chaudhary" before his name and doesn't use "Chautala" after his name. Please visit those links, I have already given those links and his mobile number
 * This facebook URL is from his offical page, can you use that ?
 * https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=521226566035393&set=a.521226519368731
 * Thank you (talk) 04:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi - if you've met him multiple times that is a connection. If you're a member of a political party of which he's been a member of, that is a connection. The connections do not necessarily imply a conflict of interest, but you should make a disclosure (frankly, anybody who is a member of any political party who writes on political figures in their own country should disclose). Self-published sources are not reliable and in many cases cannot be used. WP:COMMONNAME explains how Wikipedia determines the titles of articles; the vast majority of reliable sources refer to him as Ranjit Singh Chautala. The photo you have linked is not copyright free and cannot be used. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 10:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * He is a Power Minister in Haryana, I went to his office for some power related issue at my village and I had to go there many times. How’s does that makes a connection, thousands of people visit ministers for some issue everyday. I asked his office staff about his background so they told me who he is, frankly I was not even aware and there was not much information about him on Wikipedia so that’s why I updated his information.
 * Are you gonna write “Chaudhary” and remove “Chautala” or not ? (talk) 05:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi - you only provided personal, anecdotal information. Wikipedia is based on verifiable, reliable sources. If you can show that the preponderance of reliable sources term him something other than Ranjit Singh Chautala, then we could change the title of the article. If I were to claim that I met him too, can you disprove my claim? You cannot. Which is precisely why Wikipedia is not based on the claims of the editors who build this encyclopedia, but only on reliable sources that can be verified. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 10:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pankaj Vohra


A tag has been placed on Pankaj Vohra, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &mdash; Tulsi   24x7  06:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Pankaj Vohra moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Pankaj Vohra, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 08:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't get it, what you are trying to say. It is really very confusing, I can't understand the problem. You can check this source about the person I'm creating the page about, he is a renown senior journalist of India
 * https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/user/pankaj-vohra (talk) 08:25, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * A journalist having a lot of articles published is not an indication of that journalist's notability; they are simply doing their job as it is the job of a journalist to publish (or broadcast). A journalist is notable because others have recognised that journalist and written about that journalist in reliable sources.  The article that was moved to draft space does not show, using reliable sources, why Pankaj Vohra should be considered notable; again to reiterate, having a lot of articles published or appearing on television as a commentator, is not by itself enough to demonstrate that a person is notable.  There must be independent, reliable sources with significant coverage of the person. Please read: WP:NBIO. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 10:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * As per the “itv network” website Mr. Pankaj Vohra is the Managing Editor of newspaper “The Sunday Guardian” . The Sunday guardian news paper was founded by MJ Akbar, who became Rajya Sabha Mp and Minister. Sunday Guardian was acquired by itv networks, whose founder Kartikeya Sharma is current Rajya Sabha MP. Check the website link which says that Pankaj Vohra is the Managing Editor of this big Newspaper company https://www.itvnetwork.com/about-team (talk) 07:00, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * (talk) 07:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The sources you have posted do not establish notability. The first two cannot be used as they are not independent of the subject, they are simply statements by his employers.  The third is simply promotional, essentially a curriculum vitae.  I would encourage you to read WP:RS which explains in detail what is acceptable in terms of sourcing.  Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Pankaj Vohra for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pankaj Vohra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pankaj Vohra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. - GA Melbourne (talk) 09:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:G-23 Congress
Hello, 50FN1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:G-23 Congress, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:G-23 Congress


Hello, 50FN1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "G-23 Congress".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 00:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pankaj Vohra
Hello, 50FN1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pankaj Vohra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pankaj Vohra


A tag has been placed on Pankaj Vohra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Pankaj Vohra. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pankaj Vohra


Hello, 50FN1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pankaj Vohra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Palam 360 Khap (Dilli)
Hello, 50FN1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Palam 360 Khap (Dilli), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Palam 360 Khap (Dilli)


Hello, 50FN1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Palam 360 Khap".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Lord Puneet Kumar Superstar moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Lord Puneet Kumar Superstar. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and it has major structural and citation problems and no categories. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lord Puneet Kumar Superstar


A tag has been placed on Lord Puneet Kumar Superstar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Noneate (talk) 07:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lord Puneet Kumar Superstar


The article Lord Puneet Kumar Superstar has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable person. Article shows no evidence of passing WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. A WP:BEFORE search shows some tabloid-style sources, but nothing to show notability outside of participation in Bigg Boss OTT."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 21:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Header-Image Puneet-Kumar 63a2d1c6cb36b.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Header-Image Puneet-Kumar 63a2d1c6cb36b.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Puneet Superstar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Puneet Superstar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Puneet Superstar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 07:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lord Puneet Kumar Superstar
Hello, 50FN1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lord Puneet Kumar Superstar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Lord Puneet Kumar Superstar


The page Draft:Lord Puneet Kumar Superstar has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Liz Read! Talk! 02:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)