User talk:51.219.131.128

November 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Daniel Sperber, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:27, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Saul Berman, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Dov Linzer, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 15:33, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rabbi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dov Linzer, you may be blocked from editing.   Sir Joseph (talk) 17:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at International Rabbinic Fellowship. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 08:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that in this edit to Chaim Kanievsky, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;talk 09:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dina Brawer, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Slon02 (talk) 14:36, 15 February 2022 (UTC)