User talk:51.6.35.255

Hello, I'm Moriwen. Thank you for your contributions to Prince Louis of Wales. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! — Moriwen (talk) 22:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

WP:NOTBROKEN
Hi,

I've noticed that a number of your recent edits involve changing redirected links to piped links. For example at "Julian Rhind-Tutt", you changed  to , and there are numerous other examples. Wikipedia generally recommends against doing this, as explained at "WP:NOTBROKEN".

Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 23:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

PS Also, check out WP:NOPIPE and MOS:NOPIPE. In fact, the whole section at MOS:L is worth a read.

October 2023
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Prunella Scales, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 22:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at James the Red Engine, you may be blocked from editing. ''Your edits seem to consiste almost entirely of removing redirects. Whilst not obviously harmful, this is fundamentally pointless, we have a policy directly against it (you were advised to read WP:NOTBROKEN some time ago), and often it's a degradation of the article. It is not better to avoid a redirect: sometimes the link is the most appropriate target (see your change at Maxine Peake), we just don't happen to have an article at that location because the editors who could be writing it are instead kept far too busy dealing with make-work cleanup after editors like you. Please stop.'' Andy Dingley (talk) 21:05, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. PhilKnight (talk) 03:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)