User talk:511KeV/Archive 7

Re : draft Arijit Kundu
what are you suggesting me, to add? MRKUNA (talk) 12:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey @MRKUNA, I reviewed the draft Arijit Kundu, and I have not accepted it. The draft does not cite any source to verify the content. I am suggesting you to add References from Reliable sources to draft. signed, 511KeV  (talk) 13:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks
, Thank you for accepting Emiway. 223.238.216.75 (talk) 12:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Dear user, I had accepted the draft but it seemed too soon for the draft to be incorporated into the Mainspace. So I have again moved it to the Draftspace. I suggest you to improve the article by providing more inline citations. Thankyou. signed, 511KeV  (talk) 13:00, 7 May 2021 (UTC)


 * , Why do you think it's not ready for mainspace? Whereas Dan arndt had greatly improved it. If he wanted, he could decline it. I would request you to move it to the main space or submit it for review. 223.238.216.75 (talk) 13:08, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Dear user, I have moved the article back to Draftspace because I believed some more ammendments can be made like The discography section needs more citations and needs to be formatted. Also, the original title Emiway Bantai has been protected so that only administrators can create it. Accepting this article seems to bypass the protection of the page. If you are not satisfied with my review, you can again submit it for review so that other editors can review it. signed, 511KeV  (talk) 13:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)


 * , I have now added quite a few sources to the discography section. Mostly I have seen in many articles that there is not much source in the discography section (it is not possible to find reliable source for every subject). And the administrator says that if the reviewers accept it, then we will remove its protection. I think you should accept it. 223.238.216.75 (talk) 15:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Dear user, I have raised the issue with the Adminstrator who had protected the page Emiway Bantai. I will come to a conclusion after they have reduced the protection level of the page. Since sources cover the subject as Emiway Bantai, it will be better to get this title than Emiway. Thankyou. signed, 511KeV  (talk) 23:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thank you. I think they would have shown the draft decline. So that is probably why they have not given any answer yet. The rest I have improved. 2402:3A80:10DF:A8F:AC42:4C38:5226:9A00 (talk) 08:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

@iflag
@iflag does that means my article is ready for main space ?? Kaytunez (talk) 09:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey @, I check the draft (Oppong Clifford Benjamin) you have submitted for the review. Unfortunately, it has not be accepted, the reason has been posted by the reviewer on the review. Which means the  draft is not ready for Mainspace. Thankyou and Happy editing. signed,  511KeV  (talk) 09:37, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Emiway Bantai
Hello, hope you are well. I want to make Emiway Bantai. But when I saw the draft Emiway it was rejected. The draft was entirely under the coverage of reliable sources. Don't know why the reviewer rejected it. Then I went to ask the reviewer about this, then I came to know that you too have left him a message in favor of the draft. If I want to create it on my userspace, can I? Vrjbandhu (talk) 01:29, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

, You haven't answered me yet Vrjbandhu (talk) 06:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


 * @Vrjbandhu, The page Emiway Bantai has been protected from creation so that only administrators can creat it. This has been done since the page was created multiple times even after a deletion discussion. One of the main reasons for deletion was notability. You can see the deletion discussion of these pages Articles_for_deletion/Emiway_Bantai, Articles for deletion/Emiway Bantai (Indian rapper). There is a general consensus among the editors that the subject is not notable. Keeping this in mind it is not a good idea to re-create it soon. You can ask the protecting admin about it or seek help at WP:Teahouse from experienced editors. signed, 511KeV  (talk) 07:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages
I see you recently accepted a pending change to April 10 that did not include a direct source.

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the edit notice on that page, the content guideline and/or the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide.

All new additions to the DOY pages without references are now being either reverted on-sight or in some cases where the patroller is especially motivated, immediately sourced. I've gone ahead and backed this edit out.

All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, it's not required but it sure would be helpful if you didn't accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you and please keep up your good work! Toddst1 (talk) 04:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Thankyou @Toddst1 for bringing this to my notice. I really appreciate it. I will be abiding by the rule from now onwards. Thankyou onve again. Have a good day. 😊 signed, 511KeV  (talk) 05:35, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * It's more of a request than a rule. Patrollers are not required to enforce it, but thanks for receiving the message well.  Toddst1 (talk) 15:20, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Question Regarding Editing Pages
There is a page of a local politician that is continually edited to remove certain information. In fact, you rolled back that initial removal because a source was cited. Soon after, the person made the same exact edit and it stands as is today. My question is, can someone just continually remove the information. This user edits this page exclusively SupremeNothing (talk) 03:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)


 * @SupremeNothing, I guess the page you are talking about is Scott Wiggam. Both addition and removal of content that serves to improve Wikipedia are constructive edits. As much addition of sourced content is required so is the removal of unsourced content. However, Unexplained removal of content is not acceptable. There must be a reason why a user is removing the content from the page. Removal of a single sentence must be also explained in the edit summary. Hope you got the answer. If you need more help, feel free to ask. Till then, Happy editing! signed,  511KeV  (talk) 04:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi 511KeV. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember: The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed,Rosguill talk 20:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for  maintenance so  that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

Thanks 😊
Thank you for your advice to talk to the administrator. Emiway Bantai has been created. Thank you. I have submitted 2 drafts for review. Which has not yet been reviewed. I moved a draft to the articlespace but the reviewer moved it back to the draft space. Although there will probably be some shortages at that time, but I think I have now prepared them for publication. Review once. Draft:Titliaan, Draft:Baarish Ki Jaaye. ––  𝚅𝚁𝙹 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞  01:48, 23 May 2021 (UTC)


 * @VRJ Bandhu I am glad to hear it. I have accepted the Draft:Titliaan and added some references to it. However, I believe Draft:Baarish Ki Jaaye needs more reliable sources. Kindly, add more reliable sources to the draft. Thankyou and Happy editing! signed, 511KeV  (talk) 04:31, 23 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you! What type of sources should I add because the draft is already covered by some reliable sources. ––  𝚅𝚁𝙹 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞  04:45, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Regarding Article verification
Can we get this Article Published, the subject is a Professional Football coach from Kashmir. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Muzamil_Mahmood Dar zubair 10:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Regarding Article verification
Can you get this Draft Published. The subject is a professional football coach from Kashmir. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Muzamil_Mahmood Dar zubair 10:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Dear @Darzubair, Once you think the draft has been completed, You can submit it for review. It will be then reviewed by other users, If the subject passes the review it will be moved to Mainspace. If the draft doesn't pass the review, the reason will be posted as a comment. signed, 511KeV  (talk) 14:40, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Take a look
Hi 511KeV, I have prepared an article on my userspace. I have tried to make it notable, so I ask you for your opinion on the draft. I know I am bothering you so I apologize to you. Please take a look once. ––  𝚅𝚁𝙹 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞  05:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey @VRJ Bandhu, You are doing a great job. I checked the draft, It will be better if you add some more reliable sources. I personally feel the following lines, He has been featured in Forbes India' "30 Under 30" list in 2021 and Entrepreneur India's "35 Under 35" list in 2020 are a bit promotional/advertising in nature. However it is purely based on personal taste. Over all the draft seems fine, see you. Happy Editing. signed,  511KeV  (talk) 13:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks 511KeV, I am weak to choose the source. And that is why I have to take help from experienced users every time. I do not want to bother you but still request you to help you. I apologize once again. ––  𝚅𝚁𝙹 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞  15:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * @VRJ Bandhu, Not a problem at all. Since this is a Biography of a living person, It must have proper inline citation from reliable sources. I will suggest you to have a look at these pages Source, BLP SOURCES to know more about the type of references that should be used. If you need more help kindly let me know. Till then Good bye. signed,  511KeV  (talk) 16:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)


 * 511KeV, I did not understand anything. You tell me where is the source needed? It would be easier for me. ––  𝚅𝚁𝙹 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞  01:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @VRJ Bandhu Reference number 1 seems like a blog entry, if you could replace it. signed, 511KeV  (talk) 03:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 511KeV, I changed it. Will that require further changes? ––  𝚅𝚁𝙹 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞  03:36, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * You haven't replied yet. I want you to improve and accept it. ––  𝚅𝚁𝙹 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞  00:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @VRJ Bandhu, You can submit it for review if you have completed the work on it. Then a reviewer will review your draft if accepted, the draft will be moved to the Mainspace. However, if the draft is rejected, the reason will be posted and you can improve it further. signed, 511KeV  (talk) 05:09, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

New Change
hi 511KeV I edited Islamic Republic of Iran Bodybuilding and Fitness Federation article, I just translate Persian Wikipedia Islamic Republic of Iran Bodybuilding and Fitness Federation. Persian link : https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%81%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B3%DB%8C%D9%88%D9%86_%D8%A8%D8%AF%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B2%DB%8C_%D9%88_%D9%BE%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B4_%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%85_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86

and my English version. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Islamic_Republic_of_Iran_Bodybuilding_and_Fitness_Federation

Sportre (talk) 12:53, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * @Sportre, If you are not happy with the review you can submit it again so that other reviewer can review your draft. But make sure to address the issues that have been highlighted by previous reviewers. Hope you got the answer. If you need more help you can post your question at Tea House. Thankyou and Happy Editing! signed, 511KeV  (talk) 04:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Williamstown Lighthouse page renaming
I would like to resubmit the request to rename Williamstown Lighthouse page to "Williamstown Timeball Tower" in accordance with Article titles. All relevant authorities; local government (Hobson's Bay), operator/owner (Parks Victoria), heritage register it is located on (Victorian Heritage Register), and the local historical society (Williamstown Historical Society) all refer to it as the Timeball Tower and not as Lighthouse. --Trainsofvictoria (talk) 06:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey @Trainsofvictoria, Hope you are doing well. Since the requested move has not seen any participation from other editors even after relisting, I have closed it as No consensus. However, if you still think the page move is necessary you can again request the move. Hope that answers the question. If you still need help you can ask from experienced editors at WP:Teahouse. Thankyou and Happy editing. signed, 511KeV  (talk) 07:55, 12 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey @511KeV, How do I go about relisting it? --Trainsofvictoria (talk) 10:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @Trainsofvictoria Since the last move was unsuccessful, you can request a move by placing a Request move template with proper reason at the talk page of the article. You can also check RM for detailed explanation for requested moves. Hope that solves the problem. signed, 511KeV  (talk) 10:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Page mover granted
Hello, 511KeV. Your account has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A511KeV granted] the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 11:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)


 * @Primefac Thankyou ☺️. signed, 511KeV  (talk) 11:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

submission on Leila Abdul-Rauf
Thank you for reviewing this article submission. I would appreciate knowing which of the sources cited you found unreliable or unverifiable. All sources are publicly available and have been cited in other Wikipedia articles. Tleilaxu23 (talk) 20:07, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey, It seems like almost all of the websites that you have added are unreliable. They can't be used to verify the information that you have added in the article. Wikipedia has a strict policy for Biography of Living Persons in terms of references. Articles that are about living people must be extensively backed by reliable sources. If you have any other question you can leave me a message or get help from experienced editors at Teahouse. Thankyou and Happy Editing! signed,  511KeV  (talk) 14:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Bridge Models
Err... Were you trying to mark on the user's sandbox page? I am confused by the dup rejection. – robertsky (talk) 13:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC)


 * @Robertsky Ohh! Sorry. It seems I declined the draft submission as duplicate. I should have declined the submission that was in userspace. Apologies. signed,  511KeV  (talk) 13:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , no problem. i think both of us were reviewing at the same time. I shifted the userspace submission to draftspace just a minute earlier. – robertsky (talk) 13:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @Robertsky, Thanks for bringing this to my notice. Have a good day and Happy Editing. ☺️ signed, 511KeV  (talk) 13:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

bot account
I've gone ahead and the confirmed permission to your alternate account for the next ten days, on the assumption it will have made the requisite number of edits for autoconfirmation by then, but I just thought I'd clarify that the "bot" suffix should only be used for authorized bot accounts. It's not clear to me that this is what you are intending to use it for, a number of users get around this by using a name like "511KeV AWB" to differentiate it as an AWB-only account, if that's all you are doing with it you may want to consider changing the name to reflect that. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC)


 * @Beeblebrox, Thankyou for the confirmation. I will also change the name per your suggestion. signed, 511KeV  (talk) 02:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Submission of page on S Durgaprasad
Thank you for reviewing the page on S. Durgaprasad. You have suggested to add reliable sources. I have added appropriate reliable sources and resubmitted the article for review. The references used are mostly news articles and interviews by third-party publications.

Here are some of the reference links I have added -

I have also added more references on the other people mentioned in the page, such as Sheikha Hind Bahwan and Suhail Bahwan. Do review them and let me know how to improve the article further.

Glenwrite (talk) 05:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)GlenwriteGlenwrite (talk) 05:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey, Hope you are well. Sorry to say but I don't review drafts at requests. If you have completed the work on the draft you can submit it for review so that any reviewer will review it. Thankyou and Happy Editing! signed,  511KeV  (talk) 14:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)w.

cast your vote
Hi, a user has started discussion on Articles for deletion/Emiway Bantai. I request you to cast your vote on discussion page. Thank you ––  𝚅𝚁𝙹 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞  00:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
 Hello :

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a  month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is currently a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.