User talk:5225C/2020/October

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Ajpolino • LuK3
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Jackmcbarn
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
 * Pictogram voting rename.png →

Guideline and policy news
 * A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely 1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created.

Technical news
 * The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (T261630).

Arbitration
 * The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
 * Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.

Miscellaneous
 * The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
 * Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Gilmour Racing
So you have no interest in the point of the edit? --Falcadore (talk) 13:16, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If you're referring to your edit on a closed AfD, then my interest isn't really relevant. If you want to comment on the discussion you need to put it on the nomination or article talk page, and if you want to challenge the deletion then you need to do so through deletion review. You can't tack a comment on when the discussion is over, regardless of whether or not I'm interested. To address the content of your edit, the subject's notability was not established and that situation has not changed. Gilmour Racing does not receive significant coverage, or coverage of any kind as far as I can tell, quite imply because they are an exceptionally small team competing in an obscure series. Because of that, I'm confident the deletion would be upheld by a deletion review. 5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 13:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I see you've already had the deletion refunded. I'll give you time to update the article as you wish, but I don't see how you'll be able to establish notability which is the main issue here. Furthering that, the last edit you made to the article was on October 22, the day after the AfD started. You didn't make another edit to the article despite the nomination being closed on October 29. You have added only two sources, which still does not constitute significant coverage. Despite your protest that we "ignored" your improvements to the article, you actually didn't take part in the AfD yourself. 5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 13:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Because I felt that improving the article was more important and I had faith that those involved in the discussion would keep themselves aware of this. --Falcadore (talk) 05:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Like I said, your improvements did not go far enough to address the issue with the article. Namely, a lack of any notability and meaningful coverage. 5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 05:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)