User talk:57.133.22.174

You want to see disruptive? See a user who is repeatedly reverting clearly explained edits for absolutely no reason; adding messages to talk pages that have already been removed; making false accusations of vandalism; and adding nonsensically bad text to articles. I wonder why you are not in the slightest bit bothered about that. 57.133.22.174 (talk) 16:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Are you new to Wikipedia? If not, do me a favour and tell me some of the other IPs and/or accounts that you've used. —Smalljim  16:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You really expect me to respond to such an aggressive assumption of bad faith, that you post after completely ignoring what I wrote above? 57.133.22.174 (talk) 16:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you. —Smalljim  16:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Good one. Keep on enabling disruptive editors. Keep on slandering productive ones. Do you have the slightest idea what Wikipedia is for? 57.133.22.174 (talk) 16:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Can you explain Removing content from an article? I agree this might not be a proxy but the edit I cited is clearly vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.142.141.21 (talk) 16:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)