User talk:58.176.1.159

January 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Ouyang Nana, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 10:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to Ouyang Nana. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 10:11, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Republic of China have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Republic of China was changed by 58.176.1.159 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2023-02-22T05:41:17+00:00

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Boundless Oceans, Vast Skies, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Yee no  (talk) 08:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to East Asia, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:57, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Republic of China
Taiwan has never been the abbreviation of the Republic of China, because the Republic of China was the only legal regime representing China before the founding of the People's Republic of China, and it was the exgovernment of China, just like the Qing Dynasty. Before the founding of the People's Republic of China, Taiwan had returned to China in 1945. It was China's territory, not a country. At present, the Republic of China is only a de facto region and a separatist region of China. It has not been recognized by UN or internationally ,it is not a country. Moreover, Taiwan is only the name of an island, excluding the Kinmen, Matsu and Penghu administered by the Republic of China. In addition, the name of the Republic of China does not have the word "Taiwan" on its name, so it cannot be regarded as the abbreviation of the Republic of China. 58.176.1.159 (talk) 04:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generaliation, other talk pages such as Talk:Taiwan are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. CMD (talk) 07:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm JCMLuis. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Taiwanese nationality law—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. luis  💬 01:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to East Asia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

For your arguments in talk:Taiwan against the current version
The following response is to make clear about some previous comments you left in the talk page, hope this would help you understanding the decision why "country" is favoured by the community: Taiwan aka the ROC is never a "breakaway state" or "renegade Province" as the communist China favour to use, which constitutionally regarded itself as a continuation of the original Chinese Republic dates back to its establishment in 1912 with its own sovereignty that never ceases to exist even after the Chinese Civil War, plus the fact that the Communist regime in Beijing never have actual rule in its history over any part of Taiwan, the PRC actually has no ground for pursuing the political propaganda about Taiwan as any form of "renegade Province" seceded from the communist China. This is the basic factual and historical difference about your comparison with breakaway states of North Cyprus and South Ossetia which were established from secession, nothing is similar between them.
 * I concured that the ROC can be defined as an ethinic Chinese state, but this does not make Taiwan/ROC less to be its own sovereign country. The cross-strait relations are basically two rival states vying for their legitimacy of "China", so it's in fact more similar to the current situation of Two Koreas, in which both Koreas are regarded as "countries" as well, and by your criterion, neither of them enjoy universal recognition. The terminology in referring the ROC as a "country" is based on the essence of history, which is also in conformity with the standard of other existing rival states.

LVTW2 (talk) 16:55, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * First of all, I have to admit that the Republic of China is a fact, but the Republic of China is a country and cannot represent Taiwan as a country. According to the Constitution of the Republic of China, Taiwan is a region under the jurisdiction of the Republic of China, and Taiwan is only an island. The actual jurisdiction of the Republic of China includes Taiwan and Kinmen & Matsu on the mainland, and the mainland is also a part of the Republic of China, It corresponds to the other side's statement that "Taiwan is part of China", so Taiwan cannot be the abbreviation of the Republic of China. In addition, if Taiwan is an independent country, why is it called the "Republic of China"? Why not call it the "Republic of Taiwan"? Why would Taiwan have the Mainland Affairs Council instead of directly establishing diplomatic relations with China? Why can people from other countries use passports to come to Taiwan while China can only use the Taiwan entry permit? Why did the President of Taiwan swear to Sun Yat-sen (Sun Yat-sen is also Chinese)? Why would Taiwan use the flag of the Republic of China? Before the establishment of PRC, it was also ROC. Could it be that the whole of China was Taiwan? This shows that the two sides belong to the same country, and the PRC is only a regime of ROC, just as the other side believes that ROC is a regime of PRC, regardless of the outcome, it is China, regardless of each other. It can only be said that China now has two regimes of PRC and ROC. 58.176.1.159 (talk) 14:39, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * In addition, you can't compare the two Koreas with the mainland and Taiwan. The situation of the two Koreas is that after the defeat of Japan, the United States and the Soviet Union occupied the south and the north respectively to establish ROK and DPRK, and the two governments have not controlled the other's territory at all. However, China's situation is different. ROC has been established for 38 years before the establishment of PRC, and before the establishment of PRC, the mainland was also managed by ROC in Taiwan today. At that time, ROC was also called China, and ROC was also the former dynasty for the mainland. As for the reason why the mainland opposed ROC, it was only because the "one-party system" of the Kuomintang was resented by the mainland that the PRC was founded. The United States and the Soviet Union did not intervene at all, so the Taiwan issue is China's internal affairs, the current government and the former government, not like the two Koreas. PRC is not the Soviet regime, ROC is not the American regime, they are all China! 58.176.1.159 (talk) 15:16, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Psychologist (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Revert on National Day of the Republic of China
Many people call this day "Taiwan National Day" so it should be included in the article. RoostTC (ping me!) 12:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Also, please stop trying to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. Your changes should reflect reliable sources and give WP:DUE weight. RoostTC (ping me!) 12:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
 * First of all, I have to admit that the Republic of China is a fact, but the Republic of China is a country and cannot represent Taiwan as a country. According to the Constitution of the Republic of China, Taiwan is a region under the jurisdiction of the Republic of China, and Taiwan is only an island. The actual jurisdiction of the Republic of China includes Taiwan and Kinmen & Matsu on the mainland, and the mainland is also a part of the Republic of China, It corresponds to the other side's statement that "Taiwan is part of China", so Taiwan cannot be the abbreviation of the Republic of China. In addition, if Taiwan is an independent country, why is it called the "Republic of China"? Why not call it the "Republic of Taiwan"? Why would Taiwan have the Mainland Affairs Council instead of directly establishing diplomatic relations with China? Why can people from other countries use passports to come to Taiwan while China can only use the Taiwan entry permit? Why did the President of Taiwan swear to Sun Yat-sen (Sun Yat-sen is also Chinese)? Why would Taiwan use the flag of the Republic of China? Before the establishment of PRC, it was also ROC. Could it be that the whole of China was Taiwan? This shows that the two sides belong to the same country, and the PRC is only a regime of ROC, just as the other side believes that ROC is a regime of PRC, regardless of the outcome, it is China, regardless of each other. It can only be said that China now has two regimes of PRC and ROC. 58.176.1.159 (talk) 12:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
 * So why is Taiwan called the Republic of China today? Why is Taiwan not called the Republic of Taiwan? Where is Sun Yat sen from? Where did the Xinhai Revolution take place? 58.176.1.159 (talk) 12:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
 * So why is Taiwan called the Republic of China today? Why is Taiwan not called the Republic of Taiwan? Where is Sun Yat sen from? Where did the Xinhai Revolution take place? 58.176.1.159 (talk) 12:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Did the Revolution of 1911 take place in Taiwan? Did it happen? What was Taiwan then? A Japanese colony! 58.176.1.159 (talk) 12:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Leslie Cheung. See MOS:FLAG. Binksternet (talk) 15:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Garrettw87. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. &mdash; Garrett W. {☎ ✍} 17:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests. Yee no  (talk) 23:51, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

February 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at In Your Area World Tour.  — 🧧🍊 Paper9oll  🍊🧧 (🔔 • 📝)  14:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. NM 07:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)