User talk:58.6.225.246

November 2023
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Stefan Molyneux. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 05:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Apparently, I wasn’t being neutral. Grayfell, where’s the neutrality if the poor moderate Stefan Molyneux is being demonised just for telling the truth? 58.6.225.246 (talk) 06:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view, you may be blocked from editing. Andre🚐 09:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring at Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view
Your recent editing history at Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Valjean (talk) ( PING me ) 00:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

NOTFORUM
Your screeds about the political POV of sources are violations of WP:NOTFORUM, WP:SOAPBOXING, and unhelpful. By extension, they do not assume good faith in other editors' efforts. We use all kinds of sources, and their political bent is of little concern, as long as they are rated as RS. Do not bring up the political angle again. Such comments will be removed as unconstructive. -- Valjean (talk) ( PING me ) 00:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

I want to set the record straight
I made the last 2 edits under this IP address. The second last one was a mistake, not vandalism. And the first 11 were made by someone else. I've told them why they were being silly. --Grey Clownfish (talk) 11:31, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that you are the same person who edits as this IP number? -- Valjean (talk) ( PING me ) 18:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes and no. Like probably most IP addresses, there are more than one person viewing Wikipedia on it. There are 13 edits under this IP address, and I only made the last two. I disagree with the main 58.6.225.246 about Stefan Molyneux not being a white-supremacist. I don't know where such an belief comes from, and I don't share it.
 * And I didn't mean to log out for the second last edit. In fact, not only did I mistakenly make that edit logged out, I made it to the wrong page. And then I was so embarassed, worried about exposing my IP address, and wanting to show that I wasn't a vandal, that I just reverted it without logging in. I don't understand why blocked my IP address after that, since couldn't they see that I had immediately reverted my edit, hence it was clearly accidental.
 * I felt the need to "set the record straight" because I was kind of angry that my accidental edit was being seen as a pattern of disruptive edits, when in fact, it wasn't me who made the first 11 edits. I also figured that by editing logged out, I was honestly making it obvious that this was my IP address, since I created Template:Aegotheliformes-stub logged in after turning Template:Caprimulgiformes-stub into an Aegotheliformes stub template logged out. --Grey Clownfish (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Grey Clownfish, thanks for the clarification. In the future, just make sure you are logged in. We don't really need to know your IP address. That's one of the advantages of registering a username. You have more security and privacy. -- Valjean (talk) ( PING me ) 16:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)