User talk:58.7.148.11

September 2017
Please refrain from constantly reverting the edits placing Tanner Buchanan as a recurring character on Designated Survivor. Neither ABC (American Broadcasting Company) nor other reliable sources identify him as one. He was billed in a starring role in the pilot, but his role is now recurring. If you feel differently, please a) provide a reliable source that he's main cast and; b) DISCUSS on the talk page. If you revert again, it may be necessary to take action that can result in your ability to edit being blocked. -- -- Dr. Margi  ✉  17:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)


 * I have seen seven episodes of Designated Survivor and he is credited as main cast in all of them. If you actually clicked on the source provided you would see that your source says that he is main cast. Bay 58.7.148.11 (talk) 01:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)


 * No, the source doesn't say that. Moreover, when you've seen the entire season, you'll see he is no longer main cast.  He was billed that way for a few episodes, then lowered to recurring.  STOP reverting and discuss on the show's talk page.  -- -- Dr. Margi   ✉  02:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)


 * "Tanner Buchanan will be a series regular and McKenna Grace will recur on the drama" That is straight from the source. It does say that he is main cast. Literally everything except wikipedia says he is main cast. HE IS MAIN CAST. Bay


 * Did you read what I wrote above? Once you've seen the whole season, you'll see what happened to the character.  -- -- Dr. Margi   ✉  02:23, 9 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Even if he was only credited as main cast for part of the season, he was still apart of the main cast. What you're then supposed to do is make a note at the bottom saying something like "Tanner Buchanan is credited as a series regular up until episode 10 or 15 or whatever episode number" for the article about Designated Survivor Season 1. Then for the article about the show as a whole you simply say in brackets "(season 1)" after his name.


 * Look at The Originals (season 1) and see how there are notes at the bottom about Claire Holt and Daniella Pineda being credited as main cast for only part of the season. Then look at The Originals (TV series) and see that it says "(season 1; special guest star season 2-)" and "(season 1)" after Claire Holt and Daniella Pineda's names. Baileyyyjolde (talk) 07:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC) (talk)

Your recent editing history at Designated Survivor (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please stop making disruptive edits. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- -- Dr. Margi  ✉  07:49, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Editorializing
Please don't add your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, such as "the film received positive reviews". This is known as original research, and it's forbidden. We already have two review aggregators listed for most films, and they do the job of telling people what the reception is. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Saying things like that isn't my own personal analysis! It's the general consensus of critics i've read commenting on it. I'm not saying whether I liked a film or not, I'm saying whether critics   did or not.