User talk:58.9.183.167

I think if you check the IPs of all those involved you will find firstly i am curretly 8ooo miles away from Plymouth and secondly most if not all the students in that area share the same networks which are provided free by BT. Clealry i am not in any such network. Why did you delete this:-

' ==Comparison to Piccadilly Circus== -   - Its as well this mall was not built in London otherwise it may have been named Picadilly circus requiring the deletion of the article at Piccadilly_Circus in the same fashion to which the article that once stood here was deleted. My daughter is at Plymouth University and since i last looked here i notice that i can no longer find the interesting facts and features of Drake Circus such as the Money centre, university, musuem, library, art college, reservoir, bomb-shelter tradegy etc etc. Having recently visited my daughter it is clear as daylight - - ::1. The correct name of the nearby mall is DrakeCircus - just because the local rag of no known repute makes a typo does not mean Wikipedia has to make that same typo. On the other hand if i am wrong and you are right then there is no need to reinstate the link to DrakeCircus.com as according to you it is Drake Circus and not DrakeCircus. - ::2. The mall - which is not yet finished (as there is a huge purple builders fence cutting off a third of the site) - is not in Drake Circus. Its in Bretonside. - ::3. The only person who is evidently permitted to edit this article is quite clearly doing so through an extremely biased POV to further their own commercial objectives in maintaining a link to a commercial site. - ::4. Finally if the area does not meet Wkipedias criteria for inclusion then why is there an article on picadilly Circus? Drake Circus to those who know or are connected to the area is notable. The area should have its own article and the mall should have its own under its name - drakecircus. This will keep both those who use Wikipedia for their own study and the marketing spammers happy '
 * As I said, you are the user who is causing disruption of the article, and has already been blocked several times. We'd prefer you didn't edit Wikipedia any longer; your point of view has been fully explained already, and there's no need to add it again to the talk page or to make inappropriate changes to the article.  If you actually are the parent of a student (which I'm afraid I don't believe at this point), you should know that your daughter has been behaving very badly at Wikipedia, and has dragged you into supporting her bad behavior.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)