User talk:59.102.16.216

== /* Garcetti v Celallos  With reference to the Supreme Court case there is the mention that Justice Connor retired and was replace with Justice Alito---who began the deciding vote with the 5-4 holding. That strikes me as unmitigated BIAS. Most certainly not 'reporting' any where near objectivity. That reference most certainly ought to be omitted.t    */ new section ==

Garcetti v Celallos--with the reference to the Supreme Court case there is the mention that Justice O'Conner retired and Justice Alilto suceeded her, and with same,J Alilto cast the deciding vote with the 5-4 holding. That mention evidences an unmitigated BIAS against the decision. That apparent commentaroy ought to be omitted.

Philip Brown pbfilbrown14@gmail.com 26 Oct 2021