User talk:59.167.234.14

June 2018
Hello, I'm Johnuniq. An edit that you recently made to David Unaipon seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Johnuniq (talk) 02:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I noticed that you recently removed content from Castilleja aquariensis without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93  → Message me. ← 01:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019
Hello, I'm Donner60. Your recent edit to John C. Calhoun appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aftermath of the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, you may be blocked from editing. Dawnseeker2000 23:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
Hello, I'm DannyS712. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Slavery in ancient Rome— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. DannyS712 (talk) 02:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Slavery in ancient Rome. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:55, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Slavery in ancient Rome was changed by 59.167.234.14 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893182 on 2019-10-16T02:55:19+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Slavery in ancient Rome. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DannyS712 (talk) 03:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)