User talk:59.88.137.203

Indic script
Please do NOT add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, as this contravenes WP:INDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 15:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:41, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya. ''Issue has been discussed and consensus is clearly against you. Stop.'' Muhandes (talk) 16:45, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

SPI
Just a friendly note this time, since you seem to be unaware of this, WP:SPI is where you report sock-puppets. You are more than welcome to raise any suspicion you have. --Muhandes (talk) 17:44, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Your recent editing history at Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Muhandes (talk) 17:47, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 17:48, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.