User talk:59.89.103.139

April 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User:Ms_Sarah_Welch— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:24, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Boing! said Zebedee with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Ms_Sarah_Welch with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Oshwah These people harassed me and tried to make me act like the way they wanted me to but I refused. They only care about their opinions. I've got to warn everybody about them so they are not able to repeat such behaviour or at the least others will be cautious when dealing with them. I'm only helping those who actually care about contributing to this site. You should be helping me instead snd have both of them blocked. 59.89.103.139 (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for attempting to harass other users. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; talk 16:58, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Typical of you mods to block me (even though it's another mod you're the same) and make up something that isn't there Oshwah. You people never care to understand anything except your own opinion. My edit here was critisicm. When I said "when you say "you are nothing more than a childish person driven mad by power who thinks only he is the one are correct", I meant it. It is critisicm because it's the truth and that's how the subject acted like. He is completely childish and driven mad with power. By the way that driven mad by power is actually phrasing of "power makes people mad". Blame the one who said that phrase if you feel it to be "uncivil". It's not uncivil or a personal attack. It's the legitimate critisicm of these mods and you don't seem no different from them. But I won't let you stop me. I am not your slave and never will be. 59.89.103.139 (talk) 17:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Hey User:Bishonen, I know you mods like to act all high and mighty and try to impose your will on others always. But I'm not going to be your slave no matter what you do. Enough of the dictatorship by the mods.
 * This project is not about offering "criticism" to other editors. It's about building an encyclopedia. Do you have any interest in that? Because if your sole activity is to correct others, you will find yourself indefinitely blocked. Oh, and the term here is admins, not mods. Liz  Read! Talk! 17:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Liz Your comments are typical of you people. You people keep making false assumptions. Did I say didn't want to contribute and build the encyclopedia? Oh and there's nothing wrong against critisicm. In my critisicm I especially point out how you mods yourselves are disruptive and are eccenteric, and both of these behaviours should disqualify anyone from being a moderator.

Everybody who does not toe your line like a slave is wrong. I do want to contribute, though I can't because you people have already blocked me because in your opinion you're the only ones correct and you don't like those who do not do what you want them to do. But I am not your slave and never will be. I'm never debasing myself over the faults of someone else and become your scapegoat. And I am going to use the word mods, there is nothing against using the term and I'm more accustomed to using it.

Some of the mods here deserve to be blocked. And doing that will be one of the most significantly positive thing to happen to Wikipedia. 59.89.40.190 (talk) 18:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)


 * WP:NOTMANDATORY. clpo13(talk) 18:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Bishonen &#124; talk 18:58, 2 April 2016 (UTC)