User talk:59.92.139.157

March 2024
Hello, I'm Skyerise. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Vedapureeswarar Temple, Puducherry, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 11:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The article clearly shows the temple is located in Puducherry, not Tamil Nadu and Google Maps also shows clearly it is Puducherry not Tamil Nadu where the temple is located and still you are lying that the temple is located in Tamil Nadu, not Puducherry and still many mistakes are present in the article and still you don't make others correct the article and still you don't provide sources and lie that the corrections of me in this wrong article is wrong and trying to destroy the corrections to this article and you should stop this now! 59.92.139.157 (talk) 11:18, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Use the article talk page and provide sources that prove what you are say or you will simply be reverted. IP editors are not highly trusted. If you are serious about editing Wikipedia, please create an account. Skyerise (talk) 11:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * First of all, find out what mistakes are on this article in Wikipedia and why i corrected them all and do research on Google Maps and Google to find out what is correct and what mistakes are on this article i corrected or you will be simply reverted. Editors like you who don't even do research on Google Maps and Google to find out what is correct and wrong on Wikipedia are not highly trusted. If you are serious about editing Wikipedia, please check out on Google Maps and Google. 59.92.139.157 (talk) 12:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vedapureeswarar Temple, Puducherry, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 11:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The article has so many mistakes and the temple is located in Puducherry not Tamil Nadu and still you are lying that everything in the article is correct and not wrong to me and boasting about it, which is wrong you should stop disrupting my corrections to this article now! 59.92.139.157 (talk) 11:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Please provide sources on the article talk page that prove that you are right. Personally, I think there are two temples, as you keep changing the name of the temple as well. This happens all the time that two temples with similar names battle over the location and name in the article. Unless you discuss on the talk page, I have no way of knowing whether that's what is going on here. Skyerise (talk) 11:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * How many times i can tell you that the temple is located in Puducherry, not Tamil Nadu and there is one temple in Puducherry alone that is named Vedapurishvarar Tripurasundari Temple, Puducherry and other temples are in Tamil Nadu and they are separate temples from this one and still you don't search and find out this one temple in Google Maps and Google and tell me that this is wrong, which is wrong already and the article already contains many spelling, word, grammar, content mistakes and still you don't make me correct this article and still disrupt the corrections of this article and don't interfere the corrections of this article now. 59.92.139.157 (talk) 11:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * You can tell me a million times, but unless you provide sources it means nothing. Use the article talk page to make your case with sources that back you up. We don't just blindly believe editors who won't even bother to make an account so that they are accountable. Skyerise (talk) 11:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * When you don't provide sources to prove yourself itself, it means nothing. When the article itself mentions it is Puducherry, not Tamil Nadu, you should do research and find out but you don't do that and still tell me that to provide sources on the talk page, which itself shows your incompetence as a editor and when i correct those mistakes on this article, you should find out what mistakes are in the article and know them but you don't do that and tell me to provide sources on the talk page, which also shows your incompetence as a editor and still you don't do that and tell me to provide sources to escape from accountability, which is wrong always. People on Wikipedia don't blindly believe people like you who don't even bother to make research on what mistakes are on these articles in Wikipedia and correct them by checking them out based on how others correct them so that they are correcting the pages properly based on how others correct these articles. 59.92.139.157 (talk) 12:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * P.S. When a regular editor asks you to take it to the talk page, you take it to the talk page unless you want to get blocked or have the article get protected. Not on your user talk page (here), which changes every time your IP address changes. On the article talk page, in this case Talk:Vedapureeswarar Temple, Puducherry. I will not reply anymore here. Skyerise (talk) 11:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * P.S. When a regular editor asks you to take it to the Google Maps and Google to check whether the information posted on this article is correct and check them out, you take it to the Google Maps and Google to check whether the posted information on this article is correct unless you want to get blocked or have the article get protected. Not on your user talk page (here), which always don't research and check whether content on Wikipedia is correct or wrong on Wikipedia every time you make mistakes like this. On the Google Maps and Google, in this case, search Vedapurishvarar Tripurasundari Temple, Puducherry on Google Maps and Google. I will not reply anymore here. 59.92.139.157 (talk) 12:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Changing temple name
You keep changing the temple name along with the location. If you change the temple name to something different than the title of the article, you will be reverted. Period. It doesn't matter if all your other changes are "right" if you change the name of the temple. The name of the temple in our sources is "Vedapurishvarar Temple" NOT "Vedapurishvarar Tripurasundari Temple". You refuse to provide sources to support changing the name of the temple, you refuse to discuss on the article talk page, and that makes your entire edit seem untrustworthy. I will be requesting that you be blocked, since you refuse to work collaboratively and gain consensus for your changes on the article talk page, instead choosing to edit war.

Your recent editing history at Vedapureeswarar Temple, Puducherry shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skyerise (talk) 18:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)