User talk:59.93.2.91

March 2024
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Traditional Berber religion, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 13:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * That article contains many mistakes and errors in its entire article and the article is not correct in its present form at all, so it should be destroyed and changed fully! 59.93.2.91 (talk) 14:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Traditional Berber religion. Skitash (talk) 14:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Vishnu Purana. Skitash (talk) 17:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Traditional Berber religion shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 14:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey! Your article Traditional Berber Religion contains many mistakes in spelling, word, grammar, content throughout the entire article and you think that correcting the article by removing all mistakes in the entire article is wrong! You should be blocked for edit warring first for breaking the three revert rule in edit warring and since this article is wrong, i am correcting by editing out all mistakes with the old corrected version and you don't want to correct those mistakes and correct it to the new way! You don't let the people correct the mistakes in this article and is making a mistake with knowing and correcting it! Now itself you should be blocked from editing because of breaking the three revert rule for knowingly or unknowingly reverting my correct edits and you should let everyone correct the article to its correct form in me now and stop disrupting everyone's corrections of this article now! 59.93.2.91 (talk) 16:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)