User talk:59.94.10.213

November 2023
Hello! I'm Arjayay. Your recent edit(s) to the page Chandragupta Maurya appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi..
 * Since chandragupta adopted jainism religion must be the what he adopted and not the past. Thank you. 59.94.10.213 (talk) 14:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * please reply to this question 59.94.10.213 (talk) 14:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Chandragupta Maurya. Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 13:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Chandragupta Maurya, you may be blocked from editing. MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 14:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chandragupta Maurya. - Arjayay (talk) 14:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Since chandragupta adopted jainism religion must be the what he adopted and not the past. Thank you. 59.94.10.213 (talk) 14:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Chandragupta Maurya shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 14:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism, as done at Chandragupta_Maurya. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 14:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.