User talk:5915961t

Welcome! Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 23:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

French titles
Please don't lowercase French titles, like you did here. See MOS:FR. When in doubt, refer to the corresponding linked article in the French Wikipedia. Happy editing, Paradoctor (talk) 19:03, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

… You're right, thanks.

5915961t (talk) 01:43, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Broken Circle Breakdown
Had read the Wiki article a couple years ago and do not recall the alternative name then. If you had stated clearly that your insertion was an alternative name rather than just drop it into a line it would not have looked so much like a prank edit. Anyway I presume you have reliable sources...Dankarl (talk) 22:37, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The alternative name in the wiki article is unsourced. I found a couple internet sources that seem to indicate the Alabama Monroe is the French title. I see no reason it needs to be in a secondary citation for an article on another topic.  And next time learn how to space and punctuate.Dankarl (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop restoring your comment on another user's page
Hi, 5915961t. No, it's not "vandalism" for Vif12vf to remove your post on their page. They're entitled to do that, please see WP:REMOVED. It's you who need to stop putting it back. If you persist, you may even ultimately be sanctioned for harassment, see WP:DRC. Mind you, I think Vif12vf was rude to remove your long explanatory comment, especially when they did it originally without even an edit summary. But the rules are on their side. Bishonen &#124; tålk 09:52, 25 February 2020 (UTC).

Hello 5915961t, you are to be commended for not getting into an edit war over your good faith edits to the Saar Protectorate article, and be assured that you also did the right thing by posting at Vif12vf's talk page to start a discussion. As uncivil as it was for him to delete your edits without an explanation and as rude as it was for him to also ignore your good faith discussion in his TP, you can't attempt to force him to engage in your discussion if he chooses not to, or --as it was in this case-- to delete your comments from his page. That said, there are a few things you can do to deal with a situation where you feel the edits you have entered are being unjustly reverted and the other editor is non collaborative: (1) Make sure you add reliable sources to your edits; (2) If an editor reverts your sourced edits, you can start a discussion in the article's talk page; as an extra measure of caution, you can use the  template to make specific user(s) aware of your discussion posting in the article's Talk Page; (3) Once a discussion has been started, editors aren't supposed to revert your edits to the article but if they do and you still feel strong about the validity of your edits, you can at that point activate the dispute resolution process (which itself consists of a number of actions with increasingly greater visibility (WP:3, WP:RFC, WP:ANI, WP:RFAR, etc.). Best regards, Mercy11 (talk) 03:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Giuseppe Tartini
After you've been reverted when trying to make a change to an article, you should take it to the Talk page for the article to try to get consensus, rather than edit war. Schazjmd  (talk)  23:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Also, I must point out that you've reverted the same edit three times on that article already. Please be aware that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reverts on a single page within a 24 hour period. Excessive reverting may result in a loss of editing privileges. Schazjmd  (talk)  23:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Orchestre de la Société des Concerts du Conservatoire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Munch ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Orchestre_de_la_Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9_des_Concerts_du_Conservatoire check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Orchestre_de_la_Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9_des_Concerts_du_Conservatoire?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello. Your recent edit to Giannopoulos appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 07:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)