User talk:5cosmo

April 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Fusionism has been reverted. Your edit here to Fusionism was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://diurnalofneweconomictheories.wordpress.com/2016/04/20/100/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Paleolibertarianism, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Paleolibertarianism was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://diurnalofneweconomictheories.wordpress.com/2016/04/20/100/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

New categories
When creating a new category, it is helpful if the basic subject for the category is defined. In the case of Category:Neohistoricals and Category:Neolibertanian Baroque, we do not have articles or topics that define or describe these schools of thoughts. Please look at WP:CATEGORY for more information. With this advice in mind, it seems to me that you are rather WP:PRECOCIOUS in your editing. So, I ask that you explain your categorizations and your prior editing history. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 04:42, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Cliometrics
I will write it, but when you delete it i can never write it again. Neohistoricals is just another name for Cliometrics! You could not know it, because you do not know New Classicals, Economic Historians, etc.5cosmo (talk) 05:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Please take some time to read about how Wikipedia works. I will do my best to assist. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 05:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I will do my best to assist. Thanks.5cosmo (talk) 07:40, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Deirdre McCloskey, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. ''Cliometrics might be viable as a category for the McCloskey article. Why? Because the article text talks about it. But the article does not mention neohistory.''  – S. Rich (talk) 19:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Neohistorical school is Descendant of German Economic History School
Hi, Rich, we have cliometrics, but problem arise when we have to name member of Cliometrics, Cliometrists are those of History School and Econometrics, all together, or History School. So I manage that theoeconomics, i ll write an article, but i need time. Don't take difficult for those who solving problem. I am economist, I just do my mission.5cosmo (talk) 02:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Douglass North. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * the attitude and edits of this new contributor are not in keeping with WP policies and guidelines. Besides the edit you mentioned, 5cosmo edited here and as an Serbian IP here with vile comments ("heil") in the edit summaries. While rationale as to my edits has been given, 5cosmo reverts without basis. Moreover, while 5cosmo says s/he has a Ph.D., the comments from 5cosmo indicate s/he is not well educated in the English language. I hope a stronger warning about these behaviors can be rendered. – S. Rich (talk) 04:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)


 * My hope is that there are no further comments that warrants stronger warnings. —C.Fred (talk) 04:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please. I will help You, but you must say please.5cosmo (talk) 02:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Cliometrics has been nominated for discussion
Category:Cliometrics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)