User talk:5minandigo

September 2017
Hello, I'm SubSeven. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --SubSeven (talk) 03:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SubSeven. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --SubSeven (talk) 03:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi this is 5minandigo Mesgen Amanov page is the only one I edit, because that is me. I don't know what reliable source I can provide to you, but please do not edit my page if you see that the same user did the edits. I am not trying to promote anything, I am just stating the facts. Someone even changed my name to Mesgen Amanow, which is incorrect, if you could please fix that and make it irreversible. If you would like to check if it's really me, please google me, find my company's e-mail and I will reply to you personally. Thank you

OK, hello there Mr. Amanov. You're new to Wikipedia, so, there are a couple of issues to explain here.

1) Wikipedia discourages people editing articles about themselves, or their own business interests.  You can read more about the policies here: WP:CONFLICT.   Best practice is for people is not to make the edits themselves, but to propose edits to their own articles on the article's talk page, for other unbiased editors to then carry out, which leads to #2..

2) In this case, I would decline to carry out your edit, because it makes a claim about top students but lacks a reliable source to verify that claim. You can read about the standards for reliable sources here: WP:RELIABLE.  In short, Wikipedia can't have anyone and everyone posting that their business is the best as this, or the best at that; you can probably see how that would lead to an overall lack of accuracy.  To justify an edit such at this, there must be a reputable article or web site to back up the claim you're making.

I have made a formal request for your article to be moved back to the correct name (an administrator has to do this). --SubSeven (talk) 03:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)