User talk:60.231.213.20

February 2020
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CLCStudent (talk) 00:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2020
Hello, I'm Tymon.r. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Warburton Highway—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Tymon. r Do you have any questions?  00:59, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tinker Bell have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tinker Bell was changed by 60.231.213.20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942016 on 2021-04-29T02:29:06+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mop. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:30, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mop was changed by 60.231.213.20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960411 on 2021-04-29T02:30:51+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mop, you may be blocked from editing. Silencemen21 (talk) 02:35, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mop. Silencemen21 (talk) 02:36, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Due to renewed vandalism, this is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Classical Chinese poetry, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Donner60 (talk) 02:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Powerade—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:32, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adam Otto von Bistram. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Adam Otto von Bistram was changed by 60.231.213.20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877532 on 2021-05-20T02:47:17+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tamworth Post Office, you may be blocked from editing. ~ANM🐁 T·C 02:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tamworth Post Office. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Wknight94 talk 03:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Tinker Bell—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Rdp060707&#124;1 Year of Service to the Encyclopedia 01:55, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tinker Bell. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;1 Year of Service to the Encyclopedia 01:58, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nagito Komaeda, you may be blocked from editing.   A S U K I T E  02:18, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Peanut Butter Conspiracy.   &#9678; | melecie |   t  02:37, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to 1966–67 Dundalk F.C. season have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 02:06, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lucius Valerius Claudius Acilius Priscillianus Maximus (consul 233). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 02:13, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lucius Valerius Claudius Acilius Priscillianus Maximus (consul 233), you may be blocked from editing. &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 02:15, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jerry Hairston Sr.. &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 02:17, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Paraponera clavata, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. echidnaLives (talk) 03:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Peter Bonnevaux—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:27, 28 April 2023 (UTC)