User talk:60.234.28.134

Hello.

I inform you that this kind of edits you made are not acceptable edits, because you deleted well sourced information. I had to revert those edits. There must be a good reason to delete that kind of information, and the reason must be explained before the removal.

I suggest you to read What_Wikipedia_is_not. Your assertion of those critical quotes being "not-needed" makes me wonder if you know that at Wikipedia we can go further than paper encyclopedias.

If you are not happy with those quotes being in the article, OR if you think that the format of those quotes is just bad, I invite you to participate on the ongoing discussion about that matter at the talk page. You may have a case, but you should present that case before removing sourced data.

Please feel free to contact with me if you have any question. See you Randroide (talk) 08:55, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Conversion therapy
You claimed that I had "not given a reason" for my edit, but I clearly stated the reason in my edit summary. Please do not edit-war; please do not revert this change without first seeking consensus at Talk. Whatever404 (talk) 16:02, 29 October 2008 (UTC)