User talk:60.234.28.166

suggestion for electron article
I apreciate your work on the article. I would like to suggest, that more electron chemistry be put in the model. My favorite chemical model is the Crystal fields model, because the name sounds like a hot actress. I think this should be put in the electron model. I would like to specify, more areas of the electron be put in the article, to clarify that all of the uses of the electron do not have a coorelation to each other, and are just models, and are not proven. Of course I cannot say that for it would be original research, but I would like it to be implied. Also, I think electron chemistry is more important than electron physcis, because it clarifies that there is a conservation of mass. This was the motivating force behind the creation of the electron in the first place... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.28.166 (talk) 08:32, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, as there is currently no article on the Crystal fields model, I would suggest creating that as a starting place. As for including it in the Electron article, well I will have to weasel out for now by saying that chemistry is more properly the focus of other articles. Even the atom article only has a limited amount of chemistry, and the real starting point for chemical models is probably Chemical element and Chemistry. I'm not opposed to covering alternate chemical models (that are properly cited) on Wikipedia, but I would like to keep the electron article mostly focused on the electron as a physical particle, rather than on the interaction between atoms.&mdash;RJH (talk) 16:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)