User talk:60.241.128.157

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from KAT-TUN. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. みんな空の下 (トーク) 21:56, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anthony DiNozzo
As I indicated when i reverted your edits last time, the content that you added is too specific to only one episode and not about the character per se. It belongs in the episode article, but not in the character article. --AussieLegend (talk) 11:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

As per BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, when you add something to an article and it is removed, don't continue to add it. If you feel the content should be added to the article, you need to discuss it on the article's talk page. While a discussion is underway, the status quo prevails. You should not continue to force the disputed content into the article. This is edit-warring and is only likely to get you blocked. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

May 2013
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ai Kato, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 23:11, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Ai Kato, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. --DAJF (talk) 22:52, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

September 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Henry Byalikov has been reverted. Your edit here to Henry Byalikov was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://twitter.com/HenryByalikov) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:32, 25 September 2014 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2016
Your recent editing history at Charlie Hunnam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DonIago (talk) 13:12, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2018
Don't add or restore material sourced to tabloid journalism to articles on living people. The relevant policy link is at WP:BLPSOURCES. No further warning will be issued. --John (talk) 09:03, 11 June 2018 (UTC)