User talk:60.242.162.75

June 2021
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Robert Bropho, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! &#8213; Qwerfjkl  &#124; 𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂 (please use&#32; on reply) 16:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Bropho
Hi Qwerfjkl,

𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂 (please use&#32; on reply) 16:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

I think there's been some confusion here.

The article already contains numerous citations from credible sources to the fact of Robert Bropho's convictions for child sex offences, including in the next paragraph after the edit.

My edit was a good faith attempt to include an important fact about a public figure in the opening sentence of a Wikipedia file, given that Robert Bropho is at least as famous in Western Australia for his status as a convicted criminal as his someone turbulent involvement in activist activities. Given that information is already included in the very next sentence, my edit was purely stylistic.

Not really sure how else to respond. I'm happy to redo the stylistic edit and give another direct link to another news article on this matter. Although it would involve providing two citations to substantially the same information in the first two sentences of the entry.