User talk:60clawsand20paws

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi 60clawsand20paws! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:15, Thursday, January 7, 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Deleted warning. --Serols (talk) 18:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi User:Serols Could you let me know what you felt was unconstructive about my edit since I just added a few commas into the sentence? Thanks! 60clawsand20paws (talk) 17:09, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, your edit was not ok. But my warning was too hard, sorry. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi User:Serols I see my mistake now! I put the comma in the word instead of after it. My apologies! Thanks for catching it! 60clawsand20paws (talk) 19:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi 60clawsand20paws, but that was just an oversight of yours, there should be of course no warning about that. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

GLX
Please be more judicious about what material you remove - some of the details you have removed have been pertinent, and I will eventually restore them. In particular, you deleted all mention to the changes to the Somerville Community Path in your most recent edit. While I am fine with simplifying that paragraph, removing it entirely is not appropriate. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi User:Pi.1415926535 I removed information regarding the Community Path because I couldn't find any sources that weren't primary to support the plans changing. If you can find other sources, I invite you to add them. 60clawsand20paws (talk) 18:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The material in that paragraph is straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source which is allowed per WP:PRIMARY. There is no policy-based reason to remove that material, nor the majority of the other cited material you have removed from the article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * User:Pi.1415926535 I didn't realize there were allowances for primary sources. My understanding was that primary sources weren't allowed unless a third-party source also verified the information. I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. 60clawsand20paws (talk) 18:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)