User talk:61.68.44.166

February 2018
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Korea University have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 04:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Location vs Space?
I am sorry if you are confused. Let me explain:


 * The word, location means 'a place of settlement, activity, or residence; a place or situation occupied; a tract of land of designated situation or limits.


 * The word, space has several meanings: "the unlimited or incalculably great three-dimensional realm or expanse in which all material objects are located (i.e. outer space) and all events occur; the portion or extent of this in a given instance; extent or room in three dimensions; the space occupied by a body; extent or area in two dimensions; a particular extent of surface

(See Dictionary.com (http://www.dictionary.com/browse/location) for examples of English usage of these terms.

In relation to marketplaces, the term, location, is preferable because virtually all marketplaces are designated places - where the land was given over by government or by custom and usage for the purpose of trading. The term, 'location' implies that the land is designated fpr that purpose. (This is all explained within the article.) And, so the term, "location" has just the right nuance required in this article. In relation to the term, 'space' one of its meanings could feasibly replace the term 'location', but lacks the subtlety of the former because it does not imply a designated area, rather it implies that a place was simply occupied by a market when a void was created by the cessation of some type of former activity. (However, other meanings do not fit at all). There is nothing in either definition, to suggest that "space" is somehow bigger in size than "location' as you have implied in your first editing change.

When editors select words for use in articles, they are usually very carefully selected for purpose. Any editor who wants to change words or phrases requires very good reasons to do so. In this particular case, there is no such reason. The original wording was perfectly acceptable, while the edited wording was OK, but it was not ideal. Therefore the original version should be allowed to stand.

BronHiggs (talk) 19:34, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Neutral point of view
I have had a look at some of your contributions and have reverted your deletion of two links to UN officials from the article, Sogang University. The reason you gave was that these persons were "not respected persons in Korea".

Firstly, you need to be very careful levelling such claims about living persons. Some people might see such statements as defamatory, which could lead to potential lawsuits against Wikipedia. (Note that, due to open editing policy, all edits are part of Wikipedia's public record and are searchable).

Secondly, you appear to be expressing a personal opinion and basing your editing decisions on that opinion. No evidence was produced to support any such allegations about these persons' respectability - therefore the opinion doesn't count. I would strongly encourage you to read Wikipedia's policy about "Neutral Point of View" WP:NPOV before proceeding to make further edits. It might also help to read Wikipedia's Manual of Style WP:MOS that has lots of advice for editing. BronHiggs (talk) 20:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)