User talk:62.0.34.134

Notification
In addition, as a result of a recent ruling, all IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. RolandR (talk) 11:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

You have already been notified that your account is not permitted to edit any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict,yet you made an edit to 1948 Palestinian exodus, which is clearly included in that restriction. I have reverted your edits, and advise you to observe this restriction; if you persist in disregarding this, you are likely to find that you are blocked from editing. RolandR (talk) 19:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Genetic studies on Jews without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 16:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
You have been notified repeatedly that IPs, and accounts with fewer than 30 days' standing and 500 edits, are not permitted to edit articles relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict, but you continue to ignore this ruling. I will report the next impermissible edit that you make, and your account is likely to be blocked from further editing. If you wish to edit these articles, you will need to establish a registered account, and edit other articles constructively until you acquire the relevant status. RolandR (talk) 12:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Notification
Despite repeated notifications and warnings, you continue to edit in the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area, from which IPs are excluded. I have therefore submitted a report against you for arbitration enforcement; you can comment on the case here. RolandR (talk) 15:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating the editing restrictions on Palestine-Israel articles, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Seraphimblade Talk to me 16:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

December 2016
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of intelligence agencies have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 13:29, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Geographical centre of Earth, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 00:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018
Please stop attempting to water down or justify the Stab-in-the-back myth article. Your changes are completely ahistorical and clearly violate the Neutral Point of View policy. Attempting to inject pseudohistory into articles without sources also violates the Verifiability policy. Editors from the IP address have previously been blocked for such behavior. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC)