User talk:62.119.135.150

November 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Budha have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Budha was changed by 62.119.135.150 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.973707 on 2021-11-17T15:11:08+00:00

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, '''you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ' Megan B....   It’s all coming to me'' till the end of time  11:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to François Jacob have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 13:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at François Jacob. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 13:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Port (computer networking)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 14:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm 3PPYB6. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Satellite—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. — 3PPYB6 — T ALK — C ONTRIBS  — 13:23, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, The Cheeky Girls. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Zerbu 💬 12:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)