User talk:62.171.196.70

June 2015
Hello, I'm McGeddon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Arachnophobia because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. McGeddon (talk) 12:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2015
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Phishing, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 10:56, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Amedeo Avogadro has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:00, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Amedeo Avogadro was changed by 62.171.196.70 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974058 on 2016-01-13T12:00:35+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Football League Cup, you may be blocked from editing. Qed237&#160;(talk) 11:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at West Ham United F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 12:14, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cheating. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Cheating was changed by 62.171.196.70 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923589 on 2016-01-18T12:15:45+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Yellow-footed tortoise— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 14:25, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adam Dahlberg, you may be blocked from editing. KylieTastic (talk) 14:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Columbian mammoth. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Columbian mammoth was changed by 62.171.196.70 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867872 on 2016-01-29T09:40:15+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:40, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Anne Hathaway (Shakespeare's wife)— because it did not appear to be constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &#160; Discant  X  10:35, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm JWNoctis. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sharpeville massacre— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  JW  Noctis talk to me 11:56, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sharpeville massacre with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  JW  Noctis talk to me 11:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Sharpeville massacre. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing.  JW  Noctis talk to me 11:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sharpeville massacre.  JW  Noctis talk to me 12:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Religious use of incense have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 13:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016
Hello, I'm Eman235. I noticed that in this edit to Embalming, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eman 235 / talk  13:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Diplocarpon rosae— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 12:14, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Kellymoat (talk) 12:38, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm Neils51. An edit that you recently made to Blackpool seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Neils51 (talk) 13:25, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Mood board— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 12:09, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Computer-aided design. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 13:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Computer-aided design, you may be blocked from editing. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Theatre of ancient Greece. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 13:03, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 14:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Grand Remonstrance—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 09:48, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grand Remonstrance. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   MichaelMaggs (talk) 12:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Marthe Cnockaert have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 10:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Edith Cavell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 10:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lenah Higbee, you may be blocked from editing. DuncanHill (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Flora Sandes. DuncanHill (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)