User talk:62.172.176.50

Can you elaborate please ?

The hypothesis that Jesus existed and did miracles is not deemed as pseudo-scientific despite lack of any evidence apart from a book and a little story from the Bible. Can you explain please ?


 * Religious faith is outside of science. Dougweller (talk) 17:30, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion
Hello, 62.172.176.50. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LuckyLouie (talk) 15:05, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Gamaliel  ( talk ) 15:43, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

"Balance"
I see you are edit warring on Black Knight satellite as well as Ancient astronaut hypothesis. Adding a fringe source such as ancient-code.com as you did here doesn't "balance" an article, because Wikipedia articles aren't supposed to be equally balanced between science and pseudoscience. Please see this section of the Neutral point of view policy. I'm afraid this is a major problem with your editing even apart from the edit warring issue. Bishonen &#124; talk 17:30, 21 May 2015 (UTC).

August 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ancient astronaut hypothesis. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 15:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.