User talk:62.19.197.133

January 2022
Hello, I'm Ifnord. I noticed that you recently removed content from Premature ventricular contraction without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ifnord (talk) 17:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Premature ventricular contraction. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. ''You are rewriting a medical article, removing valid references and adding your own opinions. PVCs, while they can occur in otherwise healthy people, are not "normal".'' Ifnord (talk) 17:04, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi 62.19.197.133! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Premature ventricular contraction several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at Talk:Premature ventricular contraction, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC)