User talk:62.194.78.60

December 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Chinese cannibalism, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:53, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chinese cannibalism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:57, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chinese cannibalism, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:59, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chinese cannibalism. Jim1138 (talk) 09:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chinese cannibalism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - the WOLF  child  09:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Chinese cannibalism. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - the WOLF  child  09:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Political views of Albert Einstein has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:30, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Political views of Albert Einstein was changed by 62.194.78.60 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958886 on 2018-06-14T23:30:01+00:00.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Political views of Albert Einstein. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:37, 14 June 2018 (UTC)