User talk:62.211.180.100

June 2024
Hi 62.211.180.100! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Macaron several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 08:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I change it once, adding reference, reference that another user deleted without any discussion 62.211.180.100 (talk) 08:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You have made the same edits at least three times. Belbury (talk) 09:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Because another user keep deleting them without any explanation and my edita have a source 62.211.180.100 (talk) 09:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Macaron shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Belbury (talk) 09:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't understand why I receive this message but the other who reverted A SOURCED text get a pass 62.211.180.100 (talk) 09:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * They also got a warning, but are on an IP that changes.
 * I've requested that the article be protected to stop the two of you from constantly flipping it back and forth. Belbury (talk) 09:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:00, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.