User talk:62.211.233.175

July 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on To Love You More. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Continuing the disruption of Special:Contributions/82.51.12.168. Binksternet (talk) 17:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at I'm Alive (Celine Dion song). ResPM (T&#x1F508;&#x1F3B5;C) 10:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — AP 499D25  (talk)  10:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

New message from AP 499D25
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:I'm Alive (Celine Dion song) § External links. &#x0020;I urge you to stop making any further edits to these articles now, and discuss with me in the linked thread why the links should be added. — AP 499D25  (talk)  12:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Please read WP:ELPOINTS for guidance on what should appear in the "External links" section of an article; especially point #3: "Links in the External links section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links." Your additions are excessive in number and unnecessary, as there is a great deal of overlap, if not outright duplication. Thank you for your attention to the issue. signed, Willondon (talk) 15:14, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 2 weeks for disruptive editing and edit-warring on multiple pages. Use the article talkpage to propose, and develop consensus for, your edits instead.. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Abecedare (talk) 15:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)