User talk:62.232.175.94

January 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Amazing Animals. - I Need Support - :3 16:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Amazing Animals. First off, it has poor editorialized wording, second, not appropriate for encyclopedic means, third, non-neutral, fourth, shouting MOS:CAPS, in all, disruptive. 182.58.172.35 (talk) 13:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 16:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

April 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Animal theme park, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;Let's discuss about the plans 09:07, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Animal theme park seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;Let's discuss about the plans 09:12, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Great Dane, you may be blocked from editing. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hanna-Barbera. Aoi (青い) (talk) 02:55, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Great Dane.   Jamesluiz102 (talk) 03:20, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism, as done at Great Dane. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. — Ched (talk) 05:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hanna-Barbera, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Aoi (青い) (talk) 07:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. — Ched (talk) 08:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2021
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hanna-Barbera, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Aoi (青い) (talk) 23:22, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nickelodeon (British and Irish TV channel)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nickelodeon (British and Irish TV channel). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Paramount Global, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Viacom (2005–2019). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:05, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 15:13, 11 November 2022 (UTC)